Here are some highlights:
This case presents an interesting paradox: courts routinely require sex offenders on community supervision to take and pass polygraph exams - even though their mere existence, let alone results, is inadmissible. But Texas law is clear that the existence and results of a polygraph examination are inadmissible for all purposes.
Unless and until, the Court of Criminal Appeals lifts its ban on polygraph test results, trial courts lack the discretion to revoke an individual's community supervision for failing an exam.
We do not hold that polygraph exams cannot be imposed as a condition of community supervision or used as part of a sex-offender treatment program. Even though the test results are inadmissible, polygraph exams allow treatment providers to monitor compliance, and they can serve as a catalyst for further investigation. Nor do we hold that failure to take a test is inadmissible or that trial courts lack the discretion to revoke community supervision for failing or refusing to take a court-ordered polygraph.So, to summarize the summary, Courts may impose polygraph exams as a condition of community supervision and the inidividual must submit to the exam, but they can completely fail the exam by totally lying throughout and their community supervision cannot be revoked. That's an interesting loophole.
See the full opinion in Leonard v. State HERE.